A Practical Platform for Fairness Analysis
Fair Trial Analysis is built around a simple idea: when legal standards turn on effect, probability, prejudice, or impact, those questions should be evaluated with methods capable of measuring those things. The Solutions platform brings that idea into practice through litigation services, applied case work, and transparent research tools.
If You Want Fairness, Measure It.
Trial Errors & Omissions
Compare the probability of a specified outcome in the actual trial condition with the probability of that outcome in a hypothetical error-free trial. This solution is designed to support appellate arguments about whether a trial error was harmless or harmful.
Post-Conviction Analysis
Evaluate the likely effect of trial errors, omissions, or missing evidence in a hypothetical constitutionally adequate trial. This solution is particularly suited to prejudice analysis in post-conviction and habeas proceedings.
Custom Research Design
Some cases require more than a standard two-condition comparison. Fair Trial Analysis can develop custom research designs for matters involving multiple trial strategies, multiple omitted facts, layered procedural questions, or more complex verdict structures.
Amicus Curiae Briefs
Some cases require more than a standard two-condition comparison. Fair Trial Analysis can develop custom research designs for matters involving multiple trial strategies, multiple omitted facts, layered procedural questions, or more complex verdict structures.
Case Evaluation
Estimate the probability of a specified jury outcome under a single trial condition to help counsel assess trial risk before trial. This solution is designed to inform early decision-making with case-specific evidence rather than intuition alone.
Trial Strategies
Compare outcome probabilities across two trial conditions to evaluate how alternative case presentations, evidentiary choices, or strategic decisions may affect likely jury responses. This solution is especially useful when counsel wants to test competing approaches before trial.
Juror Selection
Identify relationships between juror characteristics and support for key case outcomes in order to better understand how different types of jurors respond to the case. This solution can inform voir dire and the strategic use of peremptory strikes.
Effect of Prejudicial Evidence in Oklahoma v. Andrew
Add context to your column. Help visitors understand the value they can get from your products and services.
Effect of Brady Violation in Georgia v. Carter
Add context to your column. Help visitors understand the value they can get from your products and services.
Effects of Varying Jury Verdict Rules
Add context to your column. Help visitors understand the value they can get from your products and services.
Civil Liability for Accidental Shooting
Add context to your column. Help visitors understand the value they can get from your products and services.
Scientific Analysis of Trial Errors (SATE) package helps users estimate the probability that a jury will find a defendant guilty given jurors’ preferences and compare actual and hypothetical trial conditions for harmful-error analysis.
Designed for Rigor, Efficiency, and Practical Use
Use a clear and attention-grabbing short paragraph to engage your audience and draw them into reading the rest of your content.
Lean by Design
Fair Trial Analysis uses a deliberately efficient model so that rigorous empirical work can be conducted without the overhead typically associated with large consulting structures.
Built for Real Cases
The methods are designed for applied use in litigation, not just academic discussion. The goal is to produce analysis that is clear, disciplined, and practically useful to decision-makers.
Justice for All
Use this space to add a short description. It gives enough info to earn a click.
Transparent and Defensible
Our work is grounded in published research, explicit assumptions, and reproducible methods. Where appropriate, the same underlying logic can be examined by courts, researchers, and other independent reviewers.